The relative intake of three Merino strains under different grazing
regimes estimated using alkane technology
M.A. Friend, G.E. Robards, A.R. Lindsay, S.C. Champion
Department of Wool and Animal Science, University of New South
Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia
Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production. 1995,
55: 127-129
Ninety 1991 drop Merino wethers, thirty from each of fine, medium
and strong wool strains were randomly allocated on the basis of stratified
live
weight within strains to one of three treatment groups. The first treatment
involved grazing ample good quality natural or irrigated pasture (H)
throughout the experiment so that the sheep remained in good to excellent
condition throughout. The second involved grazing restricted amounts of
pool quality nature pasture (L) throughout the experiment so that the sheep
remained in backward store condition. As a control, a third group (C) grazed
natural pasture such that the sheep subject to seasonal variations in pasture
quality and quantity and their condition varied from store to forward store
throughout the experiment.
Intake was estimated on two occasions; in February 1994, and July 1994, by
dosing with controlled-release alkane capsules. Pasture samples were taken
at these times based on observation of sheep grazing patterns. However,
later analysis showed that the pattern of alkanes in the collected herbage was
different to the alkane pattern in faecal samples, indicating that the herbage
samples were not truly representative of the herbage consumed by the sheep,
particularly at the summer sampling.
Actual intake (AI) (expressed as kgOM/day ± SE), averaged over the three
strains and three pasture types was estimated to be 1.54 ± 0.034 in February
and 1.52 ± 0.037 in July; a non-significant difference. The average AI of
group L (1.61 ± 0.037) was significantly higher than either group H (1.55 ±
0.033) or C (1.42 ± 0.032). No significant difference in AI existed between
the strains. When intake was corrected for live weight (metabolic intake, MI
= kgOM/day/kgLW0.75±SE), fine wool sheep had a significantly higher MI
(0.088±0.0021) than either strong (0.082±0.0019) or medium wool
(0.082±0.00190 sheep.
Keywords: NZSAPAB;
alkanes; grazing intake; Merino sheep
Download abstract in text format
Last Updated 25-01-1997